Warning: A non-numeric value encountered in /home/insaneme/public_html/wp-content/themes/gonzo/single.php on line 52
Sandy Hook Evidence Dawn-hochsprung-file-cache-date

Published on January 10th, 2014 | by -swansong-


Memory Hole: The Dawn Hochsprung File

The one year anniversary of Sandy Hook has come and gone. It’s been an interesting year, to be sure.

Over that time many voices have joined in the chorus of those questioning the events in Sandy Hook as they’ve been portrayed by media and law enforcement. Not since the events of September 11, 2001 have so many people been compelled, perhaps possessed, to discuss, start blogs, investigate, disseminate and articulate their uncomfortable suspicions about such an event.

We at Insanemedia are proud to have been able to add our voice and perspective to that investigative effort.

During the course of the last year a veritable mountain of circumstantial evidence has been uncovered that should provide any reasonable person with grave concerns about the story we’ve been told. Unfortunately subjective and circumstantial evidence isn’t likely to be enough to get anyone of consequence to hear us.

In truth there may be no piece of information that will get someone to listen to us…but if anything will…it might be this. In the end we’re just glad we found and saved it before it disappeared into the…

Memory Hole

from Wikipedia

A memory hole is any mechanism for the alteration or disappearance of inconvenient or embarrassing documents, photographs, transcripts, or other records, such as from a web site or other archive, particularly as part of an attempt to give the impression that something never happened.

The concept was first popularized by George Orwell’s dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984) where Big Brother’s Ministry of Truth systematically re-created all potential historical documents, —in effect; re-writing all of history to match the often-changing state propaganda. These changes were complete and undetectable.


While this article sat in drafts Connecticut State Police released the “full” report on the Sandy Hook Event. The report is a veritable treasure trove of wild anomalies, discrepancies and absurdities. Were we really supported by a free press news outlets around the country…the world…would be filled with report statements such as…

“Male walked into an elementary school and shot kids and a faculty member. Male was fatally wounded by police on scene.”

“Faculty member“, singular. Male shot by police, not a suicide. And not a whisper in the MSM.


Should one wish (rather, afford) to begin civil proceedings against the State, or various participants, you wouldn’t need to go much farther than the report itself for the required evidence.

That being said, we are pleased to add our contribution to the ever growing pile.

Memory Hole: The Dawn Hochsprung File

On December 14, 2012 the Newtown Bee ran an online article that quoted Sandy Hook’s principal, Dawn Hochsprung. In the article she provided some of the sights and sounds from inside the school during the shooting. The only problem was…she had already died.


If you’re not familiar with the story, or our original article on it, you best start there.

Sandy Hook Evidence: Dawn Hochsprung Interview, December 13th

For the sake of posterity a bing cache of the page was found and saved. It was at that point the cache date was noticed…
December 13, 2012

Thus began a 7 month effort to try and find confirmation for the accuracy of this incriminating cache date.

Efforts to try and obtain confirmation from bing were painfully slow and frustratingly ineffective. There would often be weeks in between responses and when I did hear back from someone it wouldn’t be the person to whom I spoke previously and I would basically have to begin all over again.

I told them I was a businessman involved in a real estate transaction, the details of which were to have been embargoed (kept secret until a certain time). I further told them that the details of this transaction had been caught on the Newtown Bee’s server by one of their (bing’s) servers prior to it’s prescribed release date.

I told them the only way this could be possible was if my “business associate” had prematurely leaked the details to the Newtown Bee. And if he indeed did release the info he would be in a great deal of trouble.

I made it clear to bing that my concern was not with the Newtown Bee, who would have had no idea about the embargo, but rather with my business associate who never should have released the information to begin with. Furthermore, I told them that the information had never been formally published so the Bee was in no way complicit in any wrong-doing.

Several times I stressed that before I could proceed with any punitive action against my business associate I would need proof as to the accuracy of the cache date on the article found by bing.

To help facilitate my request I provided bing with the cache of another page on the Newtown Bee’s servers that had also been cached with the same date as the Hochsprung article. I told bing that the information in the actual article was too sensitive for me to share.

2nd Bee cache

After several months of tedious correspondence with bing I finally lucked out and hooked up with someone willing to provide a brief explanation on the caching procedure and a direct answer to my question of accuracy.

*Ed note – I used a nom de plume in my exchanges with bing so don’t start calling me Derek*

—– Original Message —–
From: Microsoft Customer Support
To: Derek .
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 9:11 AM
Subject: RE: SRX1192628073ID – Bing Webmaster:Webmaster tools question

Hello, Derek

Thank you for reaching out to us and for responding back. My name is Leonard and I will be assisting you with the service request 1192628073 for today.

I understand that you wanted to know the accuracy of the last crawl date that you are able to see from the cache page from Bing. Let me explain this further.

We would like to initially let you know how Bing stores cache page and that the cache page is the last version of the current page before it has been updated by it’s webmaster or site administrator.

Bing stores the last previous version of the page. Kindly refer to the table below:

*Ed note – I am unable to recreate the table in this format. Suffice to say it was rudimentary*

Now, when the site administrator or the webmaster decides to update the current page again, it’s previous version will be the cache page. The date that reflects on the cache page is when Bing detects the update from the current page after it has been crawled by our web crawlers. To add, the web crawlers will only crawl a specific page on the allowed time or time configured by the site’s webmaster.

As an example, when the webmaster made changes to his site on June 02, 2013 and our web crawler is set to crawl that page every day, the changes will most likely appear on the next re-crawl settings which should be June 03, 2013. Then the current page on June 02 will be the cache page on June 03. You will notice that the cache page has been last crawled or updated on June 03, 2013.

To directly answer your question, the date setting which the web crawler shows on the cache page is accurate.

I know it was a pipe dream but what I was really hoping for was for someone to say, ‘Yep, I just walked over to the server and checked the date and it’s correct”, or something similar. So I kept at it.

— Original Message —
From : “Derek .”
Sent : Sunday, June 02, 2013 8:05:32 PM UTC
To : “Microsoft Customer Support”
Subject : Re: SRX1192628073ID – Bing Webmaster:Webmaster tools question


In 5 months you have been the only person to provide a simple answer to a simple question. I am very grateful.

Thank you for also providing the detailed description of the caching process.

If I might trouble you one last time…how do you know that the server cache time is accurate?

I don’t wish to be bothersome but it’s important to me that I am confident in the accuracy of that cache date/time prior to bringing this issue to the attention of my business associate.

This time I got Mark.

From: Microsoft Customer Support
To: Derek.
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: SRX1192628073ID – Bing Webmaster:Webmaster tools question

Hello Derek,

My name is Mark from Bing Technical Support and I will be assisting you with Service Request 1192628073.

Thank you for getting back to us. The server cache time is accurate since it is being updated once our crawler visits a certain page. For example, our crawler visits a page today (6/3/2013), the date that will reflect on its cache page will be 6/3/2013. The date will change after our crawler visits the page again.

That’s 2 in a row telling me the date/time is accurate. The second one stating it in a rather matter-of-fact kind of way. And why not? These are Microsoft servers, after all.

Not only is it a Microsoft server but its located at Microsoft headquarters in Redmond Washington.

microsoft campus

Domain Name: bingj.com

Registrant Name: Domain Administrator
Registrant Organization: Microsoft Corporation
Registrant Street: One Microsoft Way,
Registrant City: Redmond
Registrant State/Province: WA

Microsoft Redmond Campus

Microsoft Campus is the informal name for Microsoft’s corporate headquarters, located at One Microsoft Way in Redmond, Washington. Microsoft initially moved onto the grounds of the campus on February 26, 1986, weeks before the company went public on March 13. The headquarters has since experienced multiple expansions since its establishment.

It is estimated to encompass over 8 million ft2 (750,000 m2) of office space and 30,000-40,000 employees.


You may have noticed the dates of these mail exchanges with Bing…June 2013. You may be wondering why I held on to them for so long without making them public. In all honesty, initially, I was having difficulty comprehending what I was reading. I was having an even harder time comprehending the implications should this be true. That’s why I wanted to exhaust every avenue of investigation prior to publishing.

Kennedy and I contacted/were put in touch with several computer aficionados with expertise in the fields of networking/managing servers, etc. Not one of them could conceive of the date being anything but accurate.

It took one more seemingly mundane piece of info to get me to finally feel comfortable enough to put this one to bed.

Earlier I explained how I provided Bing with another page from the Newtown Bee that had been cached at the same time as the Dawn Hochsprung article.

At the time I passed this page along to Bing all I had was the actual page cache. But I now have further confirmation of the likely accuracy of both cached pages. Click for large image.

Bee article search result

As you can see, the article, “Superintendent Reports on State of the Schools” was not only cached on Dec.13/12 it was also PUBLISHED on Dec.13/12. Obviously it doesn’t tell us how long that article had been on the Bee’s server prior to being published but we can see that the event being written about occurred on Dec.10/12.

I can’t begin to tell you how fortuitous it was finding that page. Kennedy and I were searching the Newtown Bee for it and it seems to no longer exist. We found it through this site. Its no longer available there either.

So…what does this tell us? It tells us that the cache date on the article titled “Superintendent Reports on State of the Schools” is almost assuredly accurate. And…if that cache date is correct then…

MmHmmm, that’s, as they say, where the rubber hits the road, isn’t it?

If the “Superintendent Reports” cache date is correct then the Hochsprung cache date is also correct. And if the Dawn Hochsprung cache date is correct then the article was prepared in advance, the entire event was very likely planned in advance and Dawn Lafferty-Hochsprung was supposed to survive but didn’t.

This brings up many more questions. Why did she die? What happened? Was it a drill gone wrong? If it was a drill gone wrong would we really expect that NO participant would come forward to speak up for Dawn?

Could she still be alive? If so, why would media report her dead thereby messing up the prepared story and putting the Bee in the uncomfortable position of having to make an embarrassing retraction?


Did John Voket really speak to someone who shared similarities in appearance to Dawn? Why would someone identify themselves to media as being someone they were not? And why would that false assertion of identity not raise the suspicions of the Newtown Bee and the police and spark an investigation into this person?

Short of an official investigation by federal authorities we are unlikely to ever get the answers to those questions.

To that end I contacted my local RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) who, much like the FBI in the US, have the authority to investigate cross border crimes. I told the officer with whom I spoke that I was considering filing a criminal complaint but wasn’t sure if I had enough evidence to begin an investigation.

For obvious reasons I was hesitant to come right out and discuss what was on my mind so this is what I told her…

There’s a husband and wife. The husband owns and operates a small business. Along with the small business is a small website.

One night the wife is driving home and is involved in a single vehicle wreck. She dies. After a short investigation the wreck is ruled an accident. It is surmised she fell asleep at the wheel.

A couple of days later a notice appears on the business website announcing the passing of the wife and the closing of the business for an undetermined amount of time.

At that point a cached page for the announcement was found with a date preceding the accident.

I explained that I had been in contact with bing for many months attempting to verify this information and had received 2 pieces of correspondence from them stating the cache dates were accurate.

I went on to describe finding another page on the website cached at the same time, etc…and asked, if she were presented with all this information, would she find it compelling enough to investigate?

Her response was, “Absolutely”

Our conversation had gone well so I decided to come clean. I gathered up my courage, told her this actually had to do with something else, took a few deep, audible breaths which caused her to say, “Just take your time. Its ok.” and then blurted it out.

I told her the whole story.

When I was done I asked her what she thought I should do. Her response was that I should call the FBI. Her reasoning being that there may be someone from the Bee involved in a murder and it needs to be investigated.

We basically ended it there and she invited me to call back should I have any further questions or concerns.

We are weighing our options.

Should you happen to be a former or current law enforcement agent or have a measure of legal expertise and wish to provide advice, guidance or insight feel free to contact us.

I also forwarded a copy of this article to Cristina Lafferty-Hassinger (daughter of Dawn Hochsprung) via her Facebook page several days ago. Kennedy sent her a tweet informing her of the arrival of that note. I also sent the same copy to Curtiss Clark, the editor of the Newtown Bee. At the time of publication I have not received a response from either of them.



We hope you enjoyed reading Memory Hole – The Dawn Hochsprung File.  We would appreciate to read your comments below. Please share this article with as many people as you can, your help is very much appreciated! – Kennedy Ray

Tags: , ,

About the Author

Is just a guy...sick of the lies. A guy who is sick of the constant manipulating, spinning, massaging, altering, sensationalizing and outright bastardizing of the news. There's a reason they're called the "public" airwaves. They belong to us...and it's time we took them back.

64 Responses to Memory Hole: The Dawn Hochsprung File

  1. asktheanimals says:

    A word of caution; odds are good certain law enforcement agencies are a part of the disinformation, distortions and “less-than-truths” that have spread so far and wide already. Unless Interpol wants to touch this thing I wouldn’t contact any LE agency over it.
    So far with the connections running to GE, NBC, United Way, Yale, CSP and others we’re talking very powerful groups with far-reaching connections. I’d sooner take on a mafia family.

    Well done on the persistent research, who says banging your head on the wall can’t produce results? I have my own wall to beat on and though I have some dents in my skull I’m pretty sure the wall is moving too, lol. The final report is just as full of contradictions as everything else reported so far, and there are some doozies in there. Good work Swan!

    • -swansong- says:

      Thanks, Bro.

      I hear ya re: LE. Its a tough call, to be sure…but I’m getting to a point where I am feeling the need for an end game…a plan of action.

      Its all well and good to research this stuff and write about it but at some point something more proactive needs to be done.

      Shit…if they wanna come up here and hassle me they are welcome to it. But they better bundle up and have an end game of their own 🙂

      Indeed. The final report is pretty much all the evidence one needs to show this event was one big cock-up.

    • Kennedy Ray says:

      I agree. I feel the same way, they are not the sources one should contact with a complaint. Not really sure who is at this point.

  2. QK says:

    What a patient and precise piece of research! Very well done. It’s really hard to imagine that Mrs. Lafferty-Hochsprung was killed in the event. Judging by the cheerful demeanor of her daughter Erica and ex-hubby George I can only assume she’s okay.

    • -swansong- says:

      Thank you.

      Yeah…I don’t know. For all the research and investigation I am still loathed to pin myself down to a theory. It may be that some of these people are alive…and some may have died previous to the event…which would explain why the families seem too at ease with the situation.

      I just don’t know…and may never.

  3. Excellent work swan. -Erik-

  4. kirk says:

    please use this to blow this event wide open , once and for all ! i’m starting to be totally censored on much of what i see and try to comment, copy , or re-post ! only on this subject though – showed other people the censorship

  5. Pilot says:

    Well, there you have it. One more piece of evidence in a very large basket of evidence that proves this event to be nothing more than an ill conceived hoax. This is key, because it was always available for anyone (journalists??) with any interest in the case to find. But it was our swan !!! Thanks to you and Kennedy both for keeping up the great work!

  6. hollywoodpastels says:

    You have to love how self-important John Votek is at a panel with Vance on the reporting of Sandy Hook. He makes no mention of his BIG boo boo and yet mentions how he knows everyone in town and he was on scene within 20 -25 mins after Shannon Hicks. No mention at all of Dawn Hochsprung. It is on this Vimeo recording http://vimeo.com/64826322

  7. fandancer says:

    Wow! Great work. It reminds me of that movie The Village only reversed.

  8. rockethead says:

    OK, so this is an interesting and non-sensationalist entry point into the subject. I am skeptical of SH deniers, and I thank you for presenting this is a way that is not repellent to people like myself, who were deeply affected by the tragedy. I’d like to offer my opinion on two issues.

    1. I think the misattribution of a quote to Dawn Hochsprung is not evidence of anything significant. A mistake was made in a telephone conversation between two people, one or both of whom were panicked and in a hurry. There were numerous other garbled media reports on that day. As I understand your earlier article the misunderstanding occurred between two members of the newspaper staff? It seems like the reporter on site misidentified the person they were talking to.

    2. The Bing cache is more troubling, of course, but what you really have here is evidence that the Bing cache date is being calculated in error. Because, that makes much more sense then a hypothesis that fake articles about Sandy Hook were distibuted in advance to the Newtown Bee. What possible purpose could there be to distribute an error-filled article in advance to this insignificant local paper? What possible reason could there be to publish it early? If it was published early why wasn’t that immediately apparent in Google and Bing News? If it had been in circulation a day early, it inevitably would have been spotted by the millions of people searching for information on Dec 14th and afterward. What I’m saying is you would undoubtedly have ample corroborating evidence from the many scraping and aggregating sites out there. If instead there had been a secret attempt to “scrub” the errant story, and they got to the Google cached version, how did they forget the 2nd most popular search engine in the United States?
    I mean if we are presenting a single replication of the original as evidence, in an environment where there are many other “cache” copies taken out there, you really should provide some corroboration of this before you call it anything but a glitch.

    Nonetheless, I enjoyed the article and I appreciate the thorough manner you undertook to attempt to back up your claims.

    • -swansong- says:

      Quote – 1. I think the misattribution of a quote to Dawn Hochsprung is not evidence of anything significant. A mistake was made in a telephone conversation between two people, one or both of whom were panicked and in a hurry. There were numerous other garbled media reports on that day. As I understand your earlier article the misunderstanding occurred between two members of the newspaper staff? It seems like the reporter on site misidentified the person they were talking to.

      I’m afraid your understanding of this aspect of the situation is deeply flawed.

      There was no “telephone conversation”, nor was there a miscommunication between staff. This quote was given directly to John Voket…face to face…by someone who remains unidentified. Furthermore…in the video shot by Mr Voket at the fire station I would sincerely like you to point out to me just where the panic is.

      Your second point is also filled with factual inaccuracies…(the article was not “published early”, nor do we have any evidence that it was “distributed” to the Bee by anyone)…which makes me wonder if you even read the article.

      Should you wish to re-read them and comment again perhaps we can discuss facts.

      • RonPaulWins says:

        Great reply.

        Also, I’m happy that you’re providing a lot of real information. This story was a great collection of evidence & information.

  9. Ellen Ward says:

    Great work. I think the easiest way to settle it might be to have some coffins exhumed.

    • kirk says:

      i’ve said the same thing –

    • kirk says:

      would love to see flow chart on $0 Christmas Day house sales and corresponding players , also more info on properties bought way above market place and sold for million $ losses – SIRVA connection

    • kirk says:

      parker family photo – why is emi”lie” not with mom ? or at least within the children – mom with no kid makes no sense – all kids want mom !

  10. Callahan says:

    Outstanding research and tenacity. Our only hope is to get some powerful sponsors and some of the family members that realize there are serious contradictions in the report and get them to initiate and petition an independent counsel investigation.

    Not a single witness identified Lanza.
    In addition to Swan Songs discovery the petition for an investigation would allude to the lack of exculpatory evidence for the New York area man that had no explanation for being there as well as the numerous witnesses that asserted that the shooter wore a mask, wore green, beige brown pants. The armed SWAT guy in the woods that went unexplained. Lack of adequate exculpatory evidence for Chris Manfredonia who was fleeing toward Crestwood where a lock and chain on the gate had been cut in advance.

    Contradictory and incredible testimony from nurse Cox and Halstead that they hid in a closet for 4 hours until 1:15pm

    • Aaron says:

      Oh and don’t forget to allude to the contradiction where the LE fatally wounded the suspect as referenced in the CAD documentation

  11. Callahan says:


    When you switch Scott Vollmer with Adam Lanza in the narrative all the puzzle pieces start to fit. Motive, son of a kindergarten teacher, Janet Vollmer’s friends were all off or not shot fatally, New York Area man cuffed in parking lot originally from Newtown with no explanation, buzzed in because he was recognized as the son of a colleague.

    It appears Barbara Halstead buzzed him in. Every story she told is different. Her 911 call said she caught a glimpse of him running down the hall. Then one statement said that she heard glass break , was going to call the janitor then heard it again and then she looked up and saw the shooter wearing a hat and sun glasses. He shot down the hallway and then came into the office and walked out. Then she said she heard a pop and looked up immediately. So which is it Barbara?

    And of course hiding in the closet with the nurse for 4 hours establishes her level of believability and credibility. Coincidentally she came out of the closet precisely when the news reported that SWAT was deployed to a second shooter’s house. I guess Barbara and the nurse could not be blamed for identifying that shooter if they were in the closet all that time huh ?

    Not a single witness accurately described Lanza as the shooter,

  12. Aaron says:

    Interesting testimony from a teacher that hid in a closet adjacent to Rouseau’s class. She heard the shooter verbally abusing the victims and taunting them book 5 document 00019296. “Shut the f%#k up”, “look at me”,” look at them”, “you’re an asshole”, “come over here”. This is in direct contrast to the shooter in Soto’s room who was silent. More indicators of multiple shooters. Also considering that Lanza would rarely utter a word to people how likely is it that Lanza was doing all that verbalizing in the attack ?

  13. KP Ryan says:

    Really, a terrific job getting to the bottom of that Newtown Bee article and in dragging a coherent response out of Redmond. Another smoking gun.

    I haven’t noticed this on your website so perhaps you have not seen it yet… it turns out Adam Lanza phoned a Eugene Oregon radio program a year prior to the Sandy Hook incident. He ‘altered’ his voice, of course, and used a pseudonym, of course, but the media (Portland Oregonian) is printing this as fact… you really have to read it for yourself, here: http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2014/01/adam_lanza_apparently_phoned_o.html

    Did you read it? Does it seem a bit, shall I say, farfetched? Not to the Oregonian’s editors though (Nor to the boobs at the Daily News). They printed it without the requisite ‘Ha Ha Ha’ in the headline. Yet they don’t even scratch their collective heads over the Bee’s story penned days before the event… that’s just too farfetched to believe, I guess.

    But now at least we know AL was an anarchist…. I wouldn’t be surprised to ‘learn’ in the coming days or weeks he was also a closet Muslim who also surreptitiously was in contact with Osama bin Laden.

    • -swansong- says:

      Hi, KP. Thanks for the kind words.

      I am familiar with the supposed call-in. Its difficult to take seriously. One could snag a clip from any call-in show from anywhere and say its anybody…so long as that “anybody” is no longer around to contradict the assertion.

      I will say this about the segment. The caller, whomever he may be, is profoundly astute.

  14. Aaron says:

    Swansong did you see this video of Vocket ? He was on the scene immediately so there was no excuse for him getting Hochsprung wrong.


    • -swansong- says:

      Yes, I have seen that interview. As was mentioned by Namesnot_Mary…it reeks of self importance…and completely lacks any self reflection or admission of culpability in gross negligence in reporting the facts.

  15. Kpm says:

    Swan song,
    I was posting on GLP but my IP was banned…I wanted to just point out that there is a young actress by the name of Aubrey K. Miller and she looks just like the young girls interviewed the day of the shooting….I will try to post her news interview once I am registered

  16. Kpm says:

    Here is the interview, hope it works!


    • -swansong- says:

      I have to tell you…as I tell everyone…I suck at facial comparisons. Whatever the popular consensus on a particular comparison, I am usually of an opposite mind. Plus, its only one man’s opinion. That’s why I try to stick to topics less subjective.

  17. Barry Popik says:

    You’re doing great work. Have you seen the recent LivingonplanetZ YouTubes?

    The Lanza Deception – The “Lanza” Family May Only Have Existed as a CIA Operation
    Published on Jan 17, 2014

    CONFIRMED – The “Lanza” Family is CIA Connected
    Published on Jan 18, 2014

  18. Barry Popik says:

    FYI: The Avielle Richman story has taken a new turn.

    A month ago there was a video about her father, a scientist who believes in treating mental illness with drugs. Avielle’s bedroom was left intact and the videographer showed her curiously outdated toys:

    Sandy Hook Father – Pharmaceutical Scientist working on Brain Drugs to Curb Violence!!
    Published on Dec 10, 2013

    Now ,it appears that “Avielle” is alive under another name. Just another day in the Sandy Hook story:

    Absolute Proof of the Loaning of Zionist Children for the Sandy Hook Hoax
    17 January 2014

    PC Geek and the Avielle Richman Hoax
    19 January 2014

    • -swansong- says:

      Yes, Jeremy Richman is in a curiously unique position to make hay off this event.

      I’ve seen the NoDisinfo article. Not sure what to make of the facial comparison. Its not my strong suit…but PCGeek has done some good work on this event.

      For what its worth the 2 kids do look very similar to my eye.

  19. Dudeashano says:

    Great job my friend. Have you made any more progress?

    • Barry Popik says:

      I wrote to Joseph Prince to get in touch with you. I found him commenting on some KateSlate11 YouTube videos. Prince says that he has detailed information about the poor condition of the school (asbestos contamination, non-ADA compliant) and that Sandy Hook Elementary was only partly open. He also claims to have information on the casting company that was used.

      Combined with your work, it’s more than enough to generate a major news article. I have a friend at the Wall Street Journal and I’m trying to get interest there.

      Again, as for the December 13th cached date of the Dawn Hochsprung article, I really don’t think this was supposed to happen on December 14th. Dates like “9-11” and “7-7” are memorable. I think this was supposed to take place on the memorable date 12-12-12, or on Thursday (12-13) to get into Friday’s news. Maybe something in the news those two earlier days will provide a clue for the delay?.

  20. NO SECRETS says:


    Another excellent article Swansong. Don’t give up . I happen to know TPTB are exhausted from trying to quash stories like this. They can’t silence Sandy Hook truth seekers any longer. The latest story suggests Adam made a phone call to anarchy radio and discussed chimpanzees for an hour. This shows they have run out of lies and the official story is now reduced to it’s purist form (bullshit). We are winning.

  21. Kpm says:


    Could this just be the break everyone is looking for? Let’s hope it gains momentum!

    Today, Michael Harris, former Republican candidate for governor of Arizona and GOP campaign finance chairman, in an internationally televised news broadcast, cited “Israeli revenge” in, what he called, “the terrorist attack in Connecticut.”

    Harris cited Israeli “rage” against the US and against President Barack Obama. By “Israel,” we mean “Netanyahu.”

    The mission was to teach America a lesson, knowing that “America would take the punishment, keep “quiet,” and let a ‘fall guy’ take the blame.”

    A “fall guy” is another word for “patsy.”

    Harris, citing the flood of inconsistencies in the “cover story,” pointed out the following, “The facts are now becoming obvious.

    During his interview today, Mike Harris explained his rationale for looking to Israel as responsible for Sandy Hook, saying “This is exactly what Israel did in Norway; the political party that voted sanctions against Israel was retaliated against by a “lone gunman” who killed 77 children. This is what Israel always does, they go after the children. It is what they do in Gaza every day. It is what was done in Norway. It is what happened at Sandy Hook. Nobody buys the “lone gunman” story anymore, not with the Gabby Giffords’ shooting, not with the Aurora “Batman” shooting, certainly not with Breveik, and certainly not in Connecticut.”

    After Harris’ broadcast, key members of the military and law enforcement community contacted Veterans Today in full support of Harris’ analysis.


    • -swansong- says:

      “Could this just be the break everyone is looking for?”

      Unfortunately…since the original story came out almost a year ago…its unlikely.

      Its an interesting take…but it didn’t gain any traction…not even among many SH researchers.

  22. Kpm says:

    I just started researching this so I guess I am a little gung-ho on gathering articles you guys have already seen…..you have put a lot of time into this and have written great articles, I would hate to see you stop!

  23. Aaron says:

    Sedensky is unbelievable- The police statements regarding entering the lobby completely contradict his timeline.

    Hofbauer said and unknown NPD officer let him in the door. Davis said Hofbauer held the door open for him and Cario said he cannot remember if he came through the window or the door.

    Here is Sedensky’s timeline excerpt-

    9:46:48 CSP Sgt Cario running toward the front entrance of SHES, shortly followed by CSP Lt (MSGT)
    Davis. (Lt Davis’ video) Both immediately enter SHES through the broken window. (CSP and Newtown
    Officers’ Statements)
    09:46:52 CSP Lt Hofbauer is seen running to the left of Officer Hull’s vehicle between the first and
    second row of cars toward the front entrance of SHES. (Officer Seabrook’s video) Lt Hofbauer
    immediately enters SHES through the broken window. (Lt Hofbauer and Newtown PD Officers’

    • Barry Popik says:

      It’s hard to believe that anyone came in through the broken window. See:

      Sandy Hook, Book 6. They came in through the window.
      IC WhatsGoingOn
      Published on Jan 23, 2014
      At least 12 men entered the school through the hole in the window. Some exited and re-entered through this window. The furniture looks really neat and not disturbed. What does this mean?

  24. Kpm says:

    After listening to debate between Jim Fetzer and Keith Johnson it was learned, from Johnson, that the reason there was the sign “everyone must check in” and why many had lanyard IDs is because Newtown had previous hired Salamander Technologies, so that they would be ready in the event something like this would occur:

    “The Sandy Hook, Newtown and Cheshire Fire Departments utilized Salamander Intelligent Accountability (IA) solutions that they purchased from local Regional Technical Center (RTC), Higgins Corporation, prior to this terrible event. Nearly all on-scene were tagged and tracked using the department’s IA gear. This helped those responsible to resolve the situation and manage it more effectively and efficiently by allowing them to know who was on-scene and accounted for.”

    I find this very curious for a small town, maybe I’m wrong but my town has not hired a company for a just in case situation…


    [link to http://www.blogtalkradio.com]

    Salamander Technologies:


    • Will Munny says:

      Keith Johnson is not only a shill, he’s an aggressive shill. I’ve seen his act at Veterans Today and his specialty is ad hominems and demands to “debate.” He’s a joke, and his “Newtown had previous hired Salamander Technologies, so that they would be ready in the event something like this would occur” is preposterous.

      “This helped those responsible to resolve the situation and manage it more effectively and efficiently by allowing them to know who was on-scene and accounted for?”


      WHat utter BULL SHITE! That’s the type comment people make when they want to dismiss those they’re talking to as idiots.

      Any preparation to “be ready in the event something like this would occur” would be for emergency personnel procedures, not handing out ID cards, having electric “sign in here” signs and 475 cases of bottled water. The “scene” was a joke, anyway. A nonstop parade of mall browsers shuffling around in loops, while access to the alleged real scene was blocked and totally ineffective for allowing emergency responders egress.

  25. Dawn Hochsprung is being slandered after death over at GLP by a supposed Newtown / Sandy Hook resident- with a soft slander saying she was the reason for the slaughter- that she was the reason the Lanzas split up.

    It was put out there casually to see if the fish would bite, but since three toxic nitwits were spamming the thread it didn’t achieve its objective. Test failed I guess.

    But Ann E Haddad / Nancy Lanza and Lee Harvey “Adam” Lanza aside, I think this patient professional and detailed research carried out on that Bee article is a fantastic step forward.

    And no matter how many armchair experts come forward with their utter nonsense about “dimensions” or “vicsims” and all the rest of the crap, this is a straightforward matter- how did Votek misidentify a well known woman from the same tiny town he reports on? How did Hochsprung die, if she died? Same with Soto- conflicting histories (I’m tempted to use the term of art “legends”)…

    There’s smoke here. There’s fire, too.

    Another angle is the glass smashing- the killer was buzzed in, the cops smashed the glass later (version one); the killer shot out the glass from the inside (version two)… Kids were killed in “crossfire”… Cops fatally shot the shooter…

    Who actually shot Dawn Hochsprung and the kids? And why?

  26. NO SECRETS says:

    Is Autism Speaks a hate group?

    I decided to do a little more research because Anne Murphy’s obituary mentions “Autism Speaks”. While I was looking I found this article on the examiner titled “Why autistic people don’t like Autism Speaks”

    This is just the tip of the iceberg it appears because there is a lot more resentment towards the group “Autism Speaks” than I would have guessed. Just google “autism speaks hate group”

    In fact, all kinds of people have been posting their comments and some are not so favorable. Here’s one example.

    “We certainly do have an epidemic that has to be stopped and it is Autism Speaks epidemic of hateful propaganda and mass hysteria.”


    Autism Speaks was founded by Bob Wright Vice Chairman of General Electric. Who would have guessed.

    “Before taking the helm of NBC in 1986, Wright was president of GE Financial Services president of Cox Cable Communications before that. Before that, he had a diversified career in general management, marketing, and broadcasting, much of it with GE. As of May 2008 he is serving as the head of Media Mergers and Acquisitions at Thomas Lee Equity.”



    You might recall Peter Lanza worked for GE financial. You may also recall Kevin Murphy. He is the poor fellow who was run over by a train. He also worked for GE Financial. And let’s not forget the GE Muni-Scandal. Here’s the link.


    And there’s lots more where that came from.

    I have to wonder if Anne Murphy was associated with Autism Speaks and why would they promote such an organization in her obituary?

    Then I found this comment on “dcclothesline”

    ” It looks to me like the hate group Autism Speaks paid these people off for some reason.”

    Here’s some more websites. Check out the dates.

    “Advocacy groups are calling on Autism Speaks benefactors to end their support for the organization in response to a video critics say depicts people with autism”










  28. medusajoe says:


    Sandy hook chat tonight : ask wolfgang Halbig if it is logical to go grave digging without first getting sworn admittance of a drill?

    Doesn’t he realise any bodies he may find may not have been murdered at the drill?

    Ok, so now we have the open in your face admittance of just what I warned was Wolgang’s possible set up plan.
    Yes he plans to go though with what effectively amounts to digging up children’s bodies!

    And what then? What if he finds at least what seems to be buried bodies ?
    This is exactly why I said do not presume a now proven drill automatically means no one died.

    If sandy hook itself was designed to cover up real murders, then Wolfgang Halbig, a insider, a FEMA trainer, a man who was given a contract by Jed Bush no less, and a man who just happened turn up as the sandy hook investigators saviour,all of a sudden, and who took from them $30,000 worth in donations that have led to absolutely nothing.

    This man may just destroy ANY hopes whatsoever of proving that the reported Sandy Hook massacre of December 14 2014 was nothing more than a drill, and was instead a cover up of actual murders of children.

    And all that because of following logical fallacies through to their Inevitable conclusion, which can lead to success for the criminals that invented the whole sandy hook event as a means to covering up a massive child murder ring.

    And he announced his grave digging just in time for halloween, the 30 October to be exact.

    So because of the stubborn stupidity of people like Dr James Tracy and others, we may never get to prove by confession of actual first hand witnesses, that sandy hook was a drill.

    All because of Needless gun rights agendas that refuse logic.
    For a start any laws forbidding guns are not constitutional.
    So you need not worry about following logic as far as sandy hook and the most obvious drill that it was, but you must not assume no one was not murdered and the drill used to give a excuse , place and cover, for their murders that took place elsewhere.

    What should happen is this and in this order:

    First :
    get sworn civil court confessions by actual first hand witnesses ( at least two) that the reported sandy hook elementary school massacre of December 14 2012, was a drill in which there were no casualties.

    Ask the Confessing witnesses about the reported deaths of the 28 victims ( including the alleged assailant and his mother)

    Demand the authorities investigated how the children and adults were murdered. when they were murdered, and by who, and where they are buried. Then demand proof of this and a investigation into their murders and the murderers.

    This is the only way to not make everyone look like idiots, and the only way for any murderers to not get away with their crime.
    But going detecting graveyards for bodies is not the way to prove anything. And is the way to destroy the search for the truth.

    Link to the chat shall be here later


    And more fool anyone who refuses to grill Halbig on the gross stupidity of his plans to dig up graves , a plan that directly will play right into the hands of any criminals that staged the whole thing , and best of all, the most stupid part of his plans stupidity is it will let possible murderers get away with murder!

    Share this:
    Press ThisTwitterFacebook

    Sandy hook : Dr James Tracy of memory hole blog censoring comments?
    In “Sandy hook : Dr James Tracy of memory hole blog censoring comments?”
    Sandy hook was a drill all evidence points to it- Alex Jones Show(3rd HOUR-VIDEO Commercial Free) Thursday September 25 2014: Wolfgang Halbig
    In “Sandy hook was a drill all evidence points to it- Alex Jones Show(3Commercial Free) Thursday September 25 2014: Wolfgang Halbig”
    Just because nobody died at sandy hook doesn’t mean nobody was murdered
    In “Just because nobody died at sandy hook doesn’t mean nobody was murdered”

  29. medusajoe says:

    If halbig was sent This is exactly what he would do
    I warned about this exact thing.
    And to me it means there was far more than just a drill gun agendas and mental health provisions as the main motivator for the drill
    It means there was a cover up of murders!
    Or at least it gives a very bog indication to me me
    There were, because Halbig is playing right into the hands of any possible perps of child murders by doing it this way.
    A way i warned would destroy the whole search for truth and enable them to get away with it

    I lay it out
    First get sworn statements that is was a drill
    We all know it was
    But you need first hand witnesses willing to confess in public court.
    And also make sure to get theses witness to publicly state no one died at the sandy hook drill

    Then , and this is the big one!

    demand to know how the victims of sandy hook were murdered !
    And you got them all

    • Will Munny says:

      Good points, Joe. I have never liked the idea demanding bodies to be exhumed. Don’t those demanding such realize these perpetrators wouldn’t hesitate for a second to find or make 27 corpses??? And yes, that would be something controlled opposition would do. Habib is still under suspicion in my book.

      Those above… be careful at Government-Like Productions. While its silly, irreverent GIFs and topics seem innocent enough, that site is cointel ops. In fact this site has proof of that and is what made me discover this site. Watch how fast you get banned if you broach certain aspects of Sandy Hook over there at GovtLikeProds.

      As far as Hochsprung.. is it me, or did her hair grow an awful lot in a short amount of time? That one photo of her sitting on the couch appears to be the “recent” one of her. All others show her with that close-cropped ‘do. Anybody ever looked into that aspect of it? Wouldn’t it take long time to grow it out that much?

      Any new articles coming out swansong? I saw this linked at Jim Stone:


      …but I could find no other site reporting this other than this site and nothing there substantiates it.

      • -swansong- says:

        Great comments Will. Glad you took the time.

        as far as the FBI report…well…I’m not sure what to make of it. I will say this tho…i found this PDF from the FBI…made in Sept of 2013…and it does mention SH


        I did spend some time thinking about Hochsprung’s hair…but it gave me a headache.

        • MARK says:

          Have you heard of the lady that lived directly across from the school? She said in an interview that on the morning of 12-14-2012, she saw several cars pulling into the S Hook school lot well before the school was open/anyone else was around. She described them as all looking the same,I believe all silver sedans. She also says she saw a child on a skateboard that morning on the sidewalk right there, and a man in a black car following and yelling at him. soon after this interview, the ladies’ house was for sale and she had moved out. I’m sorry I don’t have the link, and I paraphrased her testimony,…..but it’s there to be found or maybe someone saved it if it’s been removed.
          Also, I received a response to a comment I made on a video, and the young lady said she lives nearby the Sandy Hook Elementary School, and she has known that it was closed down several years ago. She also says that it’s being used for storage only since then. The second sentence in her statement lends credibility; how would she know that it’s used for storage at all without living close by and having knowledge of the situation. Also,…..why would she add the part referring to its’ use for storage ,……it wasn’t necessary to add and it’s not likely that someone would invent a detail that’s not important.

  30. Pingback: Let There Be Light on Newtown/ Sandy Hoax – Day's World

  31. Emily N Closson says:

    I know it’s been three years, but have you done any further research on this or found out anything else worth noting? I’m really intrigued by all of the facts you uncovered and all of the great investigative work you wrote about. Really piqued my interest in the whole possibility of this being staged/fake/a hoax/etc etc etc…

    • -swansong- says:

      Unfortunately, no. I basically hit a brick wall on this particular issue.

      Thank you for your kind words, tho.

      • Dawn Hochsprung’s DNA was also all over the attacker’s alleged weaponry and individual rounds in the magazines etc. – not places where a victim is likely to leave DNA but somewhere that a person handling the weapnry intensively would.

Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑